> -----Original Message----- > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, > Scott > Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2017 10:18 AM > To: 'gal...@elistx.com' <gal...@elistx.com> > Cc: 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap- > object-tag-03.txt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: James Galvin [mailto:gal...@elistx.com] > > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 9:47 AM > > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> > > Cc: regext@ietf.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: > > draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap- object-tag-03.txt > > > > > > > > On 14 Sep 2017, at 8:09, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > >> Hollenbeck, Scott > > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:46 AM > > >> To: 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org> > > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] FW: I-D Action: > > >> draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap- > > >> object-tag-03.txt > > >> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On > > >>> Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org > > >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:34 AM > > >>> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > > >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action: > > >>> draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag- > > >>> 03.txt > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > >>> directories. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Title : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) > > >> Object > > >>> Tagging > > >>> Authors : Scott Hollenbeck > > >>> Andrew Lee Newton > > >>> Filename : > > >>> draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-03.txt > > >>> Pages : 12 > > >>> Date : 2017-04-18 > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > With implementation pilots starting in gTLD space I would like ask > > > again about the possibility of the WG adopting this document. > > > Verisign plans to use this approach in our pilot, and I think others > > > might be interested, too. > > > > Your chairs agree that we should move towards adopting this document. > > > > However, we need to move both launchphase and fees into the IESG for > > publication before we can adopt any new documents. Launchphase is > > there, fees is almost ready to be submitted, and so we believe we > > should be able to move towards adoption before IETF 100, but certainly > > no later than that. > > Now that IETF-100 has been completed are we any closer to considering new > documents (like this one) for WG adoption?
Come on, chairs, it's been almost a week since I sent the note above. No one has time to respond? Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
