> -----Original Message----- > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, > Scott > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:46 AM > To: 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] FW: I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap- > object-tag-03.txt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > > internet-dra...@ietf.org > > Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:34 AM > > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action: > > draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag- > > 03.txt > > > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > > > > > Title : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) > Object > > Tagging > > Authors : Scott Hollenbeck > > Andrew Lee Newton > > Filename : draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-03.txt > > Pages : 12 > > Date : 2017-04-18 > > > > Abstract: > > The Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) includes a method that > > can be used to identify the authoritative server for processing > > domain name, IP address, and autonomous system number queries. The > > method does not describe how to identify the authoritative server for > > processing other RDAP query types, such as entity queries. This > > limitation exists because the identifiers associated with these query > > types are typically unstructured. This document describes an > > operational practice that can be used to add structure to RDAP > > identifiers that makes it possible to identify the authoritative > > server for additional RDAP queries. > > > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-t > > ag/ > > This version includes a description of the Verisign Labs implementation of > the proposed tagging scheme. > > With this update I would like to ask the chairs to ask the WG to consider > adoption of this document. I would also like to ask anyone else who might > have implemented the scheme to let me know so that I can add more > information to the Implementation Status section.
With implementation pilots starting in gTLD space I would like ask again about the possibility of the WG adopting this document. Verisign plans to use this approach in our pilot, and I think others might be interested, too. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
