> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Galvin [mailto:gal...@elistx.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 9:47 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>
> Cc: regext@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-
> object-tag-03.txt
>
>
>
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 8:09, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> >> Hollenbeck, Scott
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:46 AM
> >> To: 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org>
> >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] FW: I-D Action:
> >> draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-
> >> object-tag-03.txt
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> >>> Of internet-dra...@ietf.org
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:34 AM
> >>> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org
> >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action:
> >>> draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-
> >>> 03.txt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >>> directories.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>         Title           : Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
> >> Object
> >>> Tagging
> >>>         Authors         : Scott Hollenbeck
> >>>                           Andrew Lee Newton
> >>>       Filename        :
> >>> draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag-03.txt
> >>>       Pages           : 12
> >>>       Date            : 2017-04-18
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > With implementation pilots starting in gTLD space I would like ask
> > again about the possibility of the WG adopting this document. Verisign
> > plans to use this approach in our pilot, and I think others might be
> > interested, too.
>
> Your chairs agree that we should move towards adopting this document.
>
> However, we need to move both launchphase and fees into the IESG for
> publication before we can adopt any new documents.  Launchphase is
> there, fees is almost ready to be submitted, and so we believe we should
> be able to move towards adoption before IETF 100, but certainly no later
> than that.

Ack. Something to keep in mind: as the gTLD pilots progress, I expect we'll see 
other ideas for new RDAP features and functions. We need to be prepared to 
address new documents, and since we're dealing with a zero-sum game that may 
mean being more aggressive about dropping inactive documents.

Scott

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to