> -----Original Message----- > From: James Galvin [mailto:gal...@elistx.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 9:39 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> > Cc: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap- > object-tag-03.txt > > > > On 18 Apr 2017, at 8:46, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > >> Of internet-dra...@ietf.org > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:34 AM > >> To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] I-D Action: > >> draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object-tag- > >> 03.txt > >> … > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-regext-rdap-object- > >> tag/ > > > > This version includes a description of the Verisign Labs > > implementation of the proposed tagging scheme. > > > > With this update I would like to ask the chairs to ask the WG to > > consider adoption of this document. I would also like to ask anyone > > else who might have implemented the scheme to let me know so that I > > can add more information to the Implementation Status section. > > Scott, > > Thanks for this. We will certainly add it to the list of documents to be > considered for adoption. > > Recall from our last meeting at the IETF, our AD does not want us to add > any more documents to our milestone list until we moved some things along. > > The actions we had agreed to at the meeting were as follows (summarized > from the minutes of the last meeting): > > 1. With respect to the escrow documents (which were also being considered > for adoption), the authors should revive the documents as individual > contributions and add an implementation status section. We will consider > these documents again after we complete the next two actions. > > 2. The WG needs to revisit its current list of extensions and clearly > indicate those that are to be standards track and those that just need an > entry in the extension registry. > > 3. For those documents intended for the standards track, poke the editors > to see if there is going to be forward progress or consider withdrawing > the documents. > > Once we have cleaned up our current list of adopted documents, then we can > consider adding new documents.
Great! Let's see some movement on these actions! Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
