If I understood your message correctly your Dell 2450 Did not like the Kernel upgrade ?
I have a Dell 2450 which is now not bootable after I followed the
Have you resolved this yet? I have a second service request placed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
_______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-listSend Redhat-list mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Redhat-list digest..."
Today's Topics: 1. Re: Hostname (Michael Burger) 2. Re: Hostname (Michael Burger) 3. RE: Hostname (Marcus Ouimet) 4. Re: Rescuing a Dell 2450 w/ RH 6.2 (Bret Hughes) 5. Re: how get up ma lunix partition? (Mikkel L. Ellertson) 6. RE: GF2 on Redhat 6.x? (Green, Aaron) 7. ifcfg-eth0:x problem (Michael Burger) 8. Perl under redhat (john mapoles) 9. Re: insecure memory (Leonard den Ottolander) 10. Re: Vacation program? (Leonard den Ottolander) 11. redhat image 7.0 disk 2 (Steve Lee) 12. Re: Vacation program? (ABrady) 13. Re: Ghost 113Mb? (Leonard den Ottolander) 14. Re: Annoyed and Pi...d off with Red Hat (Rodolfo J. Paiz) 15. Re: configuring red-hat to stop responding to ping requests (Rodolfo J. Paiz) 16. Re: Annoyed and Pi...d off with Red Hat (Rodolfo J. Paiz) 17. Re: Anti-aliasing Questions (Hal Burgiss)
Subject: Re: Hostname Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 15:39:14 -0400 From: "Michael Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Edit /etc/sysconfig/network, and change the "HOSTNAME=" line. On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:21:12 -0700, Marcus Ouimet wrote: >When I type hostname it comes up as: > >www.everyfan.com > >Although my site works fine running with Apache and Red Hat 6, this is >annoying. I think it came from the deafult installation. Is there anyway of >changing this? > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >
Subject: Re: Hostname Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 15:39:40 -0400 From: "Michael Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oh, yeah...you could also do it via "netconfig". On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:21:12 -0700, Marcus Ouimet wrote: >When I type hostname it comes up as: > >www.everyfan.com > >Although my site works fine running with Apache and Red Hat 6, this is >annoying. I think it came from the deafult installation. Is there anyway of >changing this? > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >
Subject: RE: Hostname Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:48:51 -0700 From: "Marcus Ouimet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thanks, that's better :-) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Burger Sent: April 2, 2001 12:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Hostname Edit /etc/sysconfig/network, and change the "HOSTNAME=" line. On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:21:12 -0700, Marcus Ouimet wrote: >When I type hostname it comes up as: > >www.everyfan.com > >Although my site works fine running with Apache and Red Hat 6, this is >annoying. I think it came from the deafult installation. Is there anyway of >changing this? > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Redhat-list mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Subject: Re: Rescuing a Dell 2450 w/ RH 6.2 Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 13:18:22 -0500 From: Bret Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Mead wrote: > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Gorkem Cetin blurted out: > > GC>5. What I've learned is: Do not treat your kernel as "any other package > GC>wandering around" - so don't upgrade it. Install it and it'll work just > GC>fine. Never leave your system with only one kernel. Do not trust anyone. > GC>Even yourself. :-) > > Too bad you hadn't read this: > > http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/howto/kernel-upgrade/kernel-upgrade.html Yep. This is without a doubt, one of the most useful documents on the redhat site. I have used these instructions for every kernel upgrade I have ever perfomed and as a result have NEVER rendered a machine unbootable. Now, where did I leave that chunck of wood for knocking on after making statement like that:) Bret
Subject: Re: how get up ma lunix partition? Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:56:14 -0500 (CDT) From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Mohammed Ennasar wrote: > > Hi all, > > I need your help. > I installed new hard disk (Drive C) as master, my linux partition is in my > old disk (Drive D) who is slave, in the drive C i installed Windows98, so > my question is how get up my linux partition to get my box dual reboot as > it was in the past? > > Thanks for your help. > m.ennasar > > If you made a Linux boot floppy, then it is easy. Boot with the floppy, log in as root, and run lilo. You will have to edit /etc/lilo.conf if your Windows partition changed. (Chances are it did not.) If you do not have a boot floppy, then you will have to boot with the install floppy, or the Red Hat cdrom, and type rescue at the LILO: prompt. Things get a bit harder after this. You have to mount your root partition, and run "lilo -r <your root directory>". If your /boot directory is on a seperate partition, you will need to mount it before you run lilo. A final option is to do an install, selectin upgrade as your install option, and do not select any packages to install. This will leave you with a few config files to clean up, so use it as your last resort. Once you have the system running again, MAKE A BOOT DISK! (mkbootdisk) Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Subject: RE: GF2 on Redhat 6.x? Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 16:29:54 -0400 From: "Green, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I haven't checked NVidia's drivers page yet. I know they have some linux drivers, anyone found these to help at all? > ---------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 9:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: GF2 on Redhat 6.x? > > "Green, Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I just installed a GeForce 2 MX in my system. I am running Redhat 6.1. > It > > picked up my TNT2 card fine but for the new card, it says unknown device > and > > X won't come up at all. Anyone know the best way to get these cards to > > work? > > Newer version of RHL - I know it will work in our latest beta, > Wolverine. More NVidia cards[1] work in RHL 7 than in 6.1, but I'm not > sure the MX is among these. > > [1] 2D only - it's recommended not to buy NVidia. > -- > Trond Eivind Glomsrød > Red Hat, Inc. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >
Subject: ifcfg-eth0:x problem Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 16:35:40 -0400 From: "Michael Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I am running a number of virtual IPs on my RH 6.1 box. All my ifcfg-eth0:x files look like this: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx NETMASK=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy ONBOOT=yes What seems to be happening is that not only do I get all the appropriate eth0:x interfaces, viewable via ifconfig, but I get additional items in my routing table, such as interfaces and default routes: linux2:~#netstat -r Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface xxx.xxx.xxx.30 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.15 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.13 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.44 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.43 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.0 * 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo default CompuComIS-NANC 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 default CompuComIS-NANC 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 default CompuComIS-NANC 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 default CompuComIS-NANC 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 default CompuComIS-NANC 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Obviously, I don't want or need the additional interfaces or default routes showing up. So, I need to know...what do I need to change/add/delete from my various ifcfg-eth0:x files to not have this mess show up? Thanks.
Subject: Perl under redhat Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:56:08 -0700 (PDT) From: john mapoles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello and help:
I think that this is a simple configuration problem. I am porting a large set of perl scripts from AIX and cygwin to redhat. At a number of point the program allows input via STDIN. The backspace, backarrow and delete keys don't work, I get their raw bindings rather than the correct action, just like when you login. I run the program from the bash shell were these keys work fine, via my .inputrc file.
Help and thank in advance for you help.
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
Subject: Re: insecure memory Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 23:26:22 +0200 From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Jason, > gpg: Warning: using insecure memory! > gpg: /home/grads/jelliot/.gnupg/secring.gpg: keyring created I have no experience with GPG specifically, but the warning probably means that GPG is using normal memory, which is swapable. This means that your unencrypted private key could end up on your swap partition. Someone with access to your system could acquire your key this way. GPG can clean (overwrite) memory after storing vulnerable key data, but not the swap partition. > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Gpg is tries to verify a message, but can't find the public key in your key table. If you bother to use PGP/GPG for secure mail transfer I suggest you start reading some docs on this, fe the Secure-Programs-HOWTO, the Security-HOWTO, etc. Bye, Leonard.
Subject: Re: Vacation program? Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 23:29:14 +0200 From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Michael, > Is there a port of the standard BSD 'vacation' program that > works with RedHat Linux 6.2 and sendmail? > > I have found two versions, but neither of them work ... If you get this working, please be so kind not to configure it to respond to this list... ;-). Bye, Leonard.
Subject: redhat image 7.0 disk 2 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:44:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> does anyone know where to get the second image. Thanks
Subject: Re: Vacation program? Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 16:45:06 -0500 (CDT) From: ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Are You Kidding? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 02-Apr-01 Leonard den Ottolander opined: > Hi Michael, > >> Is there a port of the standard BSD 'vacation' program that >> works with RedHat Linux 6.2 and sendmail? >> >> I have found two versions, but neither of them work ... > > If you get this working, please be so kind not to configure it to > respond to > this list... ;-). That is, with every email received, send a corresponding reply to the list, followed by a reply to the reply, a reply to the reply to the reply, etc. --- What Would Elvis Do?
Subject: Re: Ghost 113Mb? Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 23:38:59 +0200 From: "Leonard den Ottolander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Ashley, > What am I missing? Have you done a filesystem check? Bye, Leonard.
Subject: Re: Annoyed and Pi...d off with Red Hat Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 18:48:26 -0300 From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 4/1/01 09:36 PM -0500, you wrote: > > The different packages all have clearly defined support strategies - > > the cheapest one has installation support only, the "Professional" one > > has more AFAIR. From there, you can go all the way up to 24/7 with > > people here having your beeper - but the price goes up. > >Fits the corporate better than "the small guy". > >Aage J. Skjolingstad I disagree. I think the "small guy" is best served by not having to pay for anything he doesn't want/need. I now host a mirror site for RedHat, but before then I bought CD's for two reasons: installation support, and supporting RedHat since I'm happy with the job they've done. But I didn't have to pay for even those $45; it was my choice. I could have had the whole thing for free; but there is no free lunch, and if you want lowest cost you don't get much (or any) support. Free downloads and product, but no free support. As for your specific problem, let me suggest a couple of points: * Re your core dumps, try to test the hardware especially the memory. RH7 out of the box has been remarkably stable for me on 6 installs already over various hardware; you might find that it's not the OS's fault. * When trying to run a server, remember that frequent changes are the enemy of stability. Get your system to run, lock it down as much as possible so you don't get hacked, and LEAVE IT ALONE. Make only those changes that you need to make for security or performance reasons. If you need the newest Apache, put it in, then leave it there. Since BIND got hacked, upgrade to 8.2.3, then leave it there. But disable up2date and everything resembling it. Don't "fix" what isn't broken. Simply subscribe to redhat-watch and redhat-announce and install (1) what you have to or (2) what you really want. Not everything. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: configuring red-hat to stop responding to ping requests Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 18:54:31 -0300 From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <986026679.3ac592b757f42@localhost> <986026679.3ac592b757f42@localhost> At 4/2/01 09:58 AM +0200, you wrote: >On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 11:17:59AM +0300, Spyros Ioakim a ecrit: > > go to: > > http://www.openna.com/books/book.htm > > > > and download the book (Securing and Optimizing Linux: Red Hat Edition). > >The book says to add this to /etc/sysctl.conf: > ># Enable ignoring ping request >net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_all = 1 > >Emmanuel Seyman By the way, that book is really good. It's taking me a while to get through it since the only time I have to read is in the can, which meant AportisDoc PDF Converter into my Visor... but hey, at least it's getting read. And it has definitely provided about 10 good tips thus far (less than 10% of text read.) -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Annoyed and Pi...d off with Red Hat Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 19:05:41 -0300 From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 4/2/01 09:18 AM -0400, you wrote: >3. stay subscribed to this list as long as you can bear the volume. You >can always get a lot of help here. Even better, stay subscribed and set a filter in your mail client to: * Mark all mails from this list as read, then * Put all mails from this list in a folder This way when you have a problem, the first thing you do is run a quick search on those messages. Sometimes someone else has seen your problem before, so you get instant answers from the traffic that has already gone by even if you don't bother to read it. :) -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anti-aliasing Questions Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 18:19:04 -0400 From: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 11:40:11AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Does this mean individual apps need to be written so as to take > > advantage of this? > > _Something_ needs to take advantage of it, but it doesn't need to be > on the application level: If done in gtk, Motif and QT, it would > cover many applications without modifications. > 10-4, gotcha. I appreciate the response, and guess I'll just have to wait. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
_______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
