Bernhard Rosenkraenzer said once upon a time (Tue, 16 Jan 2001): > It isn't - it's what we're doing (at least until at least one of the > journalling FSes is really ready for prime time). I predict flak similiar to that raised over the choice of compiler in RH7.0. For the record, I would like to see ext3, jfs, xfs, and reiserfs all stable and viable filesystem choices, with mature utilities and tools to go with them. Dax _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? redhat.angus
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? John Summerfield
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Kirk
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Jean Francois Martinez
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? John Summerfield
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? redhat.angus
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Karen Shaeffer
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Dax Kelson
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Jean Francois Martinez
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Dax Kelson
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Thilo Mezger
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Christopher McCrory
- Re: reiserFS in RH7.1? Karen Shaeffer