Matt Wilson wrote:
> Uh... what "official" kernel are you looking at? You know about the
> heinous bug in reiserfs found last week, right?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matt
what is this racism against reiserfs at RedHat.
Is it because some redhat kernel hacker work on ext3 that unanimously
all redhat developper criticize reiserfs.
have you test it:
It's fast, very fast
It's reliable and very advanced.
Compare it with ext3.
I use ext3 but it does not make the weight vis-a-vis with reiserfs and
don't speak about doubtful reliability because I have really the
impression that there are only people of RedHat who see problems in
reiserfs (speak about reiserfs at BigStorage, eMusic and
ThresholdNetworks).
ext3 is perfect to bring the jounalisation to a system pre-installed but
for a new installation, reiserfs is essential, it is the filing system
of the future (for linux at least).
I have really the impression to see a company which is unaware of a
product because one of his adversary sponsorise this one, finally that
seems to be that.
And not I prefer RedHat than Suse.
The buffer overflow is fixed and reiserfs is certainly the filesystem
most supported of all.
So please stop this sempiternal criticize puerile against reiserfs
and when 2.4.1 come out with reiserfs, use it.
You will become like me a partisan of RedHat and reiserfs.
Ultimately, include reiserfs in the next release of RedHat (8.0 ?)
and you will put every one of agreement.
angus
GNU/Linux advocate
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
