On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 10:15:12AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Don't remember but apparently the guy had benchmarked it. About
> crashes, since both gcc 2.95.2 and gcc 2.96 are crashing (and gcc 2.95
> built fine in 6.2) I would point to glibc. If it builds for you and
> not for me then causes could be:
Well, hard numbers would be good to have...
> -I use more agressive flags than you (-O3)
OK, well -O3 over -O2 might cause it, but I really really doubt it.
> -You compile gcc with an older glibc and then you go for compiling the
> newer glibc. BTW that glibc is an unofficial version.
Absolutely not. Our toolchain is 100% self hosting - gcc is built
with glibc 2.1.92.
Matt
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
