Re: gcc-2.95.2

[Matt Wilson]

On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 12:32:53AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> But the gcc people tell that gcc 2.96 generates slower code than gcc
> 2.95.2.  And I have found that it can't recompile itself in pinstripe
> (it core dumps).  This could be due to glibc since when I replaced it
> with gcc 2.95.2 it crashed too.

Huh?  gcc builds itself in our tree all the time.  Who said it's
slower code?

Matt



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list