I don't know about pruckelshaus, but I find that a 170 and a 172.5 feel significantly different and it is important on a long ride. I'm unfortunately in the camp of not willing to purchase a 170 or 175 while I'm acclimated to a 172.5. I may choose to attempt to re-acclimate to a 170, but it's not in my plans.
So, this puts the V-O crank out of bounds for me, just on a practical basis. On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 20:00 -0700, pruckelshaus wrote: > > Yes, but it's too bad that Chris has decided that nobody needs to ride > > 172.5mm cranks. He's a fool for making that kind of decision, and has > > certainly lost a good amount of business because of it...including my > > own. This would be the perfect crank for my needs, if only it were > > available as a 172.5. > > Are you saying a 170 wouldn't work for you? > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- Ken Freeman Ann Arbor, MI USA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
