> Why that rather than update the name to "Atlantis 3" and have it built > in Taiwan? Why an entirely new design?
There are compelling arguments for both I think. On the one hand, the Atlantic is a classic that will always benefit a buyer. On the other, retiring the Atlantis and making an entirely new bike could be a way to bring the Riv concept to a whole new group of people that maybe are staying on the sidelines. On Aug 21, 7:21 am, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 05:02 -0700, George Millwood wrote: > > I agree with Beth, onward ever onward. The Atlantis has served its > > purpose. True enough I have one and will probably will it to a > > deserving grand nephew/niece if they're the right size. However, if > > you don't have one and you really want one then you have three > > options. Place an order now and pay whatever, buy a second hand one > > from someone who has moved on, or get a custom builder to make a > > facsimile. Grant should move on and design a new bike and give it a > > new name... > > Why that rather than update the name to "Atlantis 3" and have it built > in Taiwan? Why an entirely new design? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
