Re: [R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

Duncan Murdoch Sun, 07 Apr 2019 12:43:33 -0700

On 07/04/2019 3:01 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:

Thanks!

So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in00check.log.

The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea?


You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.
Thanks in advance
----------------
* using log directory ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ‘--as-cran’
* checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
* this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr>’

New submission

Author field should be Authors@R.  Current value is:

c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr",role = c("cre","aut")), person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",role = c("aut")))

That second author doesn't look right, but I don't think the note iscomplaining about that. I think you probably have put something likethis in your DESCRIPTION file:

Author: c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email ="blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),

           person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

and what it is saying is that you should instead use

Authors@R: c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email ="blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),

           person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
role = c("aut")))

If my guess is right and you fix it, you may still get a NOTE. To makeit easier for the CRAN maintainers to know who to contact in case of anissue with the package, they display information about the packagemaintainer in a NOTE. Since most NOTEs indicate likely problems, itwould probably make sense for them to use some other formatting for themessage, but that's how it is.


Duncan Murdoch

* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK

* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies... OK

* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
   Running ‘testthat.R’
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE

Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> a écrit :

On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays onlyone note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn'tidentified this note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'dlike to know if I can new submission in CRAN with one note. Sylvain


It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.

Duncan Murdoch


 >
 >
 >
 > Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
 >

> Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, MaëlleSALMON<maelle.sal...@yahoo.se <mailto:maelle.sal...@yahoo.se>> a écrit: I'd recommend readinghttps://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of thebook is very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how todeclare dependencies.

 >
 >
 >
 >

> Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> <cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>> skrev:

 >
 >  How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
 >   depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
 > Thanks
 > Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
 >

> Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, UweLigges<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> a écrit : .... or forgot todeclare a dependency on that package in the

 > DESCRIPTION file...
 >
 > Best,
 > Uwe Ligges
 >
 > On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
 >> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
 >> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
 >> able to help.
 >>
 >> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
 >> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
 >> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
 >> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
 >> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
 >> package)? Just a wild guess.
 >>
 >>

>> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>:

 >>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
 >>> "conflicted".
 >>>
 >>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
 >>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
 >>> vI[[i]]) :
 >>>      there is no package called ‘dplyr’
 >>>
 >>> How I can  solve this issue?
 >>>
 >>> Thanks in advance
 >>>
 >>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
 >>> <seb.me...@fau.de <mailto:seb.me...@fau.de>> a écrit :
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do

>>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary tostart

 >>> working on these conflicts now.
 >>>
 >>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results

>>>(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),

 >>> I see the following output below these messages
 >>>
 >>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
 >>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
 >>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
 >>>> argument is of length zero
 >>>
 >>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd

>>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a fewweeks ago).

 >>>
 >>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
 >>>
 >>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
 >>>
 >>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
 >>>
 >>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",

>>>> coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019",sources =

 >>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
 >>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
 >>>>            scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
 >>> "topright"),
 >>>>            col = "grey")
 >>>

>>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos ="topright")' is

 >>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
 >>>
 >>> Cheers,
 >>>
 >>>        Sebastian
 >>>
 >>>

>>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>

 >>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>>:
 >>>>
 >>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
 >>> solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
 >>>>

>>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>

 >>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >>>>>      Hi,
 >>>>>
 >>>>> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with
 >>> devtools::check of my package.
 >>>>>
 >>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :

>>>>> sylvain@sylvain <mailto:sylvain@sylvain> <mailto:sylvain@sylvain<mailto:sylvain@sylvain>>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD

 >>> check --as-cran
 >>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
 >>>>>
 >>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr :
 >>>>>            Attaching package: 'dplyr'
 >>>>>            The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
 >>>>>                        filter, lag
 >>>>>            The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
 >>>>>                        intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
 >>>>>
 >>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the
 >>> namespace the package conflicted.
 >>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning.
 >>>>>
 >>>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in
 >>> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible?
 >>>>> Thanks in advance to your help !
 >>>>> Sylvain
 >>>>> -----------------
 >>>>> Below extract of 00check.log
 >>>>> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
 >>>>> Installation failed.

>>>>> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ fordetails.

 >>>>> * DONE
 >>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Below 00install.out
 >>>>> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
 >>>>> ** using staged installation
 >>>>> ** R
 >>>>> ** inst
 >>>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
 >>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
 >>> vI[[i]]) :
 >>>>>      there is no package called ‘conflicted’
 >>>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts ->
 >>> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
 >>>>> Exécution arrêtée
 >>>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
 >>>>> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>>        Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson

>>> <henrik.bengts...@gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengts...@gmail.com><mailto:henrik.bengts...@gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>>>a écrit :

 >>>>>

>>>>> FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the followingNOTEs

 >>>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
 >>>>>
 >>>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE

>>>>> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow <cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>

 >>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>>>’
 >>>>>
 >>>>> New submission
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
 >>>>>      flowmapping (7:41)
 >>>>>

>>>>> Author field should be Authors@R. <mailto:Authors@R.><mailto:Authors@R. <mailto:Authors@R.>> Current value is:

 >>>>>      c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =

>>>>> "francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr<mailto:francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr><mailto:francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr<mailto:francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr>>",

 >>> role = c("cre","aut")),
 >>>>>                person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =

>>>>> "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr><mailto:blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr>>", role

 >>> = c("aut"))
 >>>>>
 >>>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
 >>>>> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
 >>>>> In title case that is:
 >>>>> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
 >>>>>
 >>>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").  The
 >>>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
 >>>>>
 >>>>> /Henrik
 >>>>>

>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>

 >>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>>

>>>>> <cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com><mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>>> wrote:

 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to
 >>> use r-devel?
 >>>>>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made
 >>> dev_tool::check.
 >>>>>> How can I solve my problem ?
 >>>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>      Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe

>>> Ligges<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>>> <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de<mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>>> a écrit : I cannot beloeve

 >>> it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> R CMD check --as-cran
 >>>>>>

>>>>>> with a recent R-devel version on the package tarball shouldreproduce

 >>>>>> the findings.
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> Best,
 >>>>>> Uwe Ligges
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>

>>>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com<mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>

 >>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >>>>>>> Hello,
 >>>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from
 >>> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks
 >>> automatically.Debian:

>>><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>

 >>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the
 >>> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args =
 >>> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
 >>>>>>> ── R CMD check results ──────────────────────────── cartograflow
 >>> 0.0.0.9000 ────
 >>>>>>> Duration: 54.6s
 >>>>>>> 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
 >>>>>>> R CMD check succeeded
 >>>>>>> Can you  help me to fix the problem?
 >>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
 >>>>>>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>> ______________________________________________

>>>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>>>> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>> mailing list

 >>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >>>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>>            [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 >>>>>>
 >>>>>> ______________________________________________

>>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>>

 >>> mailing list
 >>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >>>
 >>>>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 >>>>>
 >>>>> ______________________________________________

>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>>

 >>> mailing list
 >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >>>>>
 >>>>
 >>>> ______________________________________________

>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>>

 >>> mailing list
 >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 >>>>
 >>>> ______________________________________________

>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>>

 >>> mailing list
 >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >>>>
 >>
 >> ______________________________________________

>> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>mailing list

 >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >>
 >
 >
 >      [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 >
 > ______________________________________________

> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>mailing list

 > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >
 >     [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
 >
 > ______________________________________________

> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>mailing list

 > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >


______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: Re :Re: Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

Reply via email to