I put other.ot...@gmail.com because I don't show the name of the person. But
when I've made the check I've put the good name.
Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
Le dim., avr. 7, 2019 à 21:10, Jeff Newmiller<jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.us> a
écrit : don't you think is inappropriate?
On April 7, 2019 12:01:59 PM PDT, "cartograf...@gmail.com"
<cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the
>note in 00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem
>with Author.
>I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
>Do you have any idea?
>
>You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in
>advance
>----------------* using log directory
>‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
>* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
>* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
>* using session charset: UTF-8
>* using option ‘--as-cran’
>* checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
>* this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
>* package encoding: UTF-8
>* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr>’
>
>New submission
>
>Author field should be Authors@R. Current value is:
> c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr",
>role = c("cre","aut")),
> person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com",
>role = c("aut")))
>* checking package namespace information ... OK
>* checking package dependencies ... OK
>* checking if this is a source package ... OK
>* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
>* checking for executable files ... OK
>* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
>* checking for portable file names ... OK
>* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
>* checking serialization versions ... OK
>* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
>* checking installed package size ... OK
>* checking package directory ... OK
>* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
>* checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
>* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
>* checking top-level files ... OK
>* checking for left-over files ... OK
>* checking index information ... OK
>* checking package subdirectories ... OK
>* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
>* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
>* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
>* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies
>... OK
>* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
>* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies
>... OK
>* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
>* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
>* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
>* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
>* checking replacement functions ... OK
>* checking foreign function calls ... OK
>* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
>* checking Rd files ... OK
>* checking Rd metadata ... OK
>* checking Rd line widths ... OK
>* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
>* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
>* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
>* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
>* checking Rd contents ... OK
>* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
>* checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
>* checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
>* checking examples ... OK
>* checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
>* checking tests ... OK
> Running ‘testthat.R’
>* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
>* checking package vignettes in ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
>* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
>* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
>* DONE
>Status: 1 NOTE
>
>
>Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch
><murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays only
>one note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn't
>identified this note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to
>check?I'd like to know if I can new submission in CRAN with one
>note. Sylvain
>
>It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.
>
>Duncan Murdoch
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>
>> Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, Maëlle
>SALMON<maelle.sal...@yahoo.se> a écrit : I'd recommend reading
>https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the
>book is very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to
>declare dependencies.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograf...@gmail.com
><cartograf...@gmail.com> skrev:
>>
>> How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
>> depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
>> Thanks
>> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>
>> Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, Uwe
>Ligges<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a écrit : .... or forgot to
>declare a dependency on that package in the
>> DESCRIPTION file...
>>
>> Best,
>> Uwe Ligges
>>
>> On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
>>> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
>>> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
>>> able to help.
>>>
>>> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
>>> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see
>.libPaths()
>>> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a
>library
>>> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
>>> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
>>> package)? Just a wild guess.
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com:
>>>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
>>>> "conflicted".
>>>>
>>>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>>>> vI[[i]]) :
>>>> there is no package called ‘dplyr’
>>>>
>>>> How I can solve this issue?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
>>>> <seb.me...@fau.de> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which
>do
>>>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to
>start
>>>> working on these conflicts now.
>>>>
>>>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
>>>>
>(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
>>>> I see the following output below these messages
>>>>
>>>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
>>>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with
>diagnostics:
>>>>> argument is of length zero
>>>>
>>>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
>>>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few
>weeks ago).
>>>>
>>>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>>>>
>>>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>>>>
>>>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>>>>
>>>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>>>>> coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019",
>sources =
>>>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR,
>UMS
>>>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>>>>> scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>>>> "topright"),
>>>>> col = "grey")
>>>>
>>>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos =
>"topright")' is
>>>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way
>to
>>>> solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in
>advance
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I come back to you because I have always the problem with
>>>> devtools::check of my package.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :
>>>>>> sylvain@sylvain <mailto:sylvain@sylvain>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh
>CMD
>>>> check --as-cran
>>>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr
>:
>>>>>> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>>>>>> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>>>>> filter, lag
>>>>>> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>>>>> intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and
>the
>>>> namespace the package conflicted.
>>>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error
>in
>>>> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible?
>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your help !
>>>>>> Sylvain
>>>>>> -----------------
>>>>>> Below extract of 00check.log
>>>>>> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ...
>ERROR
>>>>>> Installation failed.
>>>>>> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for
>details.
>>>>>> * DONE
>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Below 00install.out
>>>>>> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
>>>>>> ** using staged installation
>>>>>> ** R
>>>>>> ** inst
>>>>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
>>>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>>>> vI[[i]]) :
>>>>>> there is no package called ‘conflicted’
>>>>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts ->
>>>> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
>>>>>> Exécution arrêtée
>>>>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
>>>>>> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson
>>>> <henrik.bengts...@gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>> a
>écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following
>NOTEs
>>>>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>>>>>> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow <cartograf...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>>’
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New submission
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>>>>>> flowmapping (7:41)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Author field should be Authors@R. <mailto:Authors@R.> Current
>value is:
>>>>>> c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
>>>>>> "francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr
><mailto:francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr>",
>>>> role = c("cre","aut")),
>>>>>> person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
>>>>>> "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr>",
>role
>>>> = c("aut"))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
>>>>>> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
>>>>>> In title case that is:
>>>>>> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there"). The
>>>>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Henrik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> <cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi, l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have
>to
>>>> use r-devel?
>>>>>>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made
>>>> dev_tool::check.
>>>>>>> How can I solve my problem ?
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe
>>>> Ligges<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
>>>> <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> a écrit : I cannot
>beloeve
>>>> it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> with a recent R-devel version on the package tarball should
>reproduce
>>>>>>> the findings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>> Uwe Ligges
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email
>from
>>>> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks
>>>> automatically.Debian:
>>>>
><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
>>>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and
>the
>>>> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args =
>>>> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
>>>>>>>> ── R CMD check results ────────────────────────────
>cartograflow
>>>> 0.0.0.9000 ────
>>>>>>>> Duration: 54.6s
>>>>>>>> 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
>>>>>>>> R CMD check succeeded
>>>>>>>> Can you help me to fix the problem?
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
>>>>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org
>>>> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> mailing list
>>>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org
><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>>> mailing list
>>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>
>>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org
><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>>> mailing list
>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org
><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>>> mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org
><mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>>> mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>______________________________________________
>R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
--
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
