I've seen in file xxxx the message below:
Package hyperref Warning: Option `pagebackref' has already been used,
(hyperref) setting the option has no effect on input line 377.
Can this generate a note?
Sylvain
Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 21:01:59 UTC+2, cartograf...@gmail.com
<cartograf...@gmail.com> a écrit :
Thanks!So, I've already check and I didn't see the descrption of the note in
00check.log.The only thing I can say is that there's a problem with Author.
I tried to put Authors@R and it also generates notes.
Do you have any idea?
You will find hereafter the copy of the file 00check.log.Thanks in advance
----------------* using log directory ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck’
* using R Under development (unstable) (2019-04-04 r76316)
* using platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
* using session charset: UTF-8
* using option ‘--as-cran’
* checking for file ‘cartograflow/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK
* this is package ‘cartograflow’ version ‘1.0.0.0’
* package encoding: UTF-8
* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Sylvain Blondeau <blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr>’
New submission
Author field should be Authors@R. Current value is:
c(person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email = "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr", role =
c("cre","aut")),
person("other", "other", email = "other.ot...@gmail.com", role =
c("aut")))
* checking package namespace information ... OK
* checking package dependencies ... OK
* checking if this is a source package ... OK
* checking if there is a namespace ... OK
* checking for executable files ... OK
* checking for hidden files and directories ... OK
* checking for portable file names ... OK
* checking for sufficient/correct file permissions ... OK
* checking serialization versions ... OK
* checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... OK
* checking installed package size ... OK
* checking package directory ... OK
* checking for future file timestamps ... OK
* checking ‘build’ directory ... OK
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* checking top-level files ... OK
* checking for left-over files ... OK
* checking index information ... OK
* checking package subdirectories ... OK
* checking R files for non-ASCII characters ... OK
* checking R files for syntax errors ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded ... OK
* checking whether the package can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the package can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be loaded with stated dependencies ... OK
* checking whether the namespace can be unloaded cleanly ... OK
* checking use of S3 registration ... OK
* checking dependencies in R code ... OK
* checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK
* checking replacement functions ... OK
* checking foreign function calls ... OK
* checking R code for possible problems ... OK
* checking Rd files ... OK
* checking Rd metadata ... OK
* checking Rd line widths ... OK
* checking Rd cross-references ... OK
* checking for missing documentation entries ... OK
* checking for code/documentation mismatches ... OK
* checking Rd \usage sections ... OK
* checking Rd contents ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in examples ... OK
* checking installed files from ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking files in ‘vignettes’ ... OK
* checking examples ... OK
* checking for unstated dependencies in ‘tests’ ... OK
* checking tests ... OK
Running ‘testthat.R’
* checking for unstated dependencies in vignettes ... OK
* checking package vignettes in ‘inst/doc’ ... OK
* checking re-building of vignette outputs ... OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
* DONE
Status: 1 NOTE
Le dimanche 7 avril 2019 à 18:22:32 UTC+2, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.dun...@gmail.com> a écrit :
On 07/04/2019 12:16 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,Thanks to your reply and your information. Right now it stays only one
> note when I've made R-devel CMD CHECK --as-cran. So, I didn't identified this
> note in repertory R.check. What's file I've to check?I'd like to know if I
> can new submission in CRAN with one note. Sylvain
It will be in cartograflow.Rcheck/00check.log.
Duncan Murdoch
>
>
>
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>
> Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 17:09, Maëlle SALMON<maelle.sal...@yahoo.se> a
>écrit : I'd recommend reading
>https://r-pkgs.org/description.html#dependencies (and the rest of the book is
>very good as well), it'll help you understand why and how to declare
>dependencies.
>
>
>
>
> Den torsdag 4 april 2019 17:05:02 CEST, cartograf...@gmail.com
><cartograf...@gmail.com> skrev:
>
> How I can declare the dependencies in DESCRIPTION file?
> depends: library(dplyr,dependencies =TRUE)
> Thanks
> Envoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>
> Le jeu., avr. 4, 2019 à 14:42, Uwe Ligges<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
>a écrit : .... or forgot to declare a dependency on that package in the
> DESCRIPTION file...
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
> On 04.04.2019 13:34, Sebastian Meyer wrote:
>> There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
>> access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
>> able to help.
>>
>> "there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
>> installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
>> for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
>> used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
>> your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
>> package)? Just a wild guess.
>>
>>
>> Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com:
>>> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
>>> "conflicted".
>>>
>>> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>>> vI[[i]]) :
>>> there is no package called ‘dplyr’
>>>
>>> How I can solve this issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>>
>>> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
>>> <seb.me...@fau.de> a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
>>> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
>>> working on these conflicts now.
>>>
>>> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
>>> (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
>>> I see the following output below these messages
>>>
>>>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
>>>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
>>>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
>>>> argument is of length zero
>>>
>>> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
>>> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).
>>>
>>> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>>>
>>>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>>>
>>> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>>>
>>>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>>>> coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources =
>>> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
>>> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>>>> scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
>>> "topright"),
>>>> col = "grey")
>>>
>>> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
>>> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograf...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
>>> solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
>>>>
>>>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograf...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I come back to you because I have always the problem with
>>> devtools::check of my package.
>>>>>
>>>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :
>>>>> sylvain@sylvain <mailto:sylvain@sylvain>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD
>>> check --as-cran
>>> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr :
>>>>> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>>>>> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>>>> filter, lag
>>>>> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>>>> intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>>>>
>>>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the
>>> namespace the package conflicted.
>>>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning.
>>>>>
>>>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in
>>> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible?
>>>>> Thanks in advance to your help !
>>>>> Sylvain
>>>>> -----------------
>>>>> Below extract of 00check.log
>>>>> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
>>>>> Installation failed.
>>>>> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
>>>>> * DONE
>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
>>>>>
>>>>> Below 00install.out
>>>>> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
>>>>> ** using staged installation
>>>>> ** R
>>>>> ** inst
>>>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
>>>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
>>> vI[[i]]) :
>>>>> there is no package called ‘conflicted’
>>>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts ->
>>> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
>>>>> Exécution arrêtée
>>>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
>>>>> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson
>>> <henrik.bengts...@gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
>>>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
>>>>>
>>>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>>>>> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow <cartograf...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>>’
>>>>>
>>>>> New submission
>>>>>
>>>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
>>>>>
>>>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>>>>> flowmapping (7:41)
>>>>>
>>>>> Author field should be Authors@R. <mailto:Authors@R.> Current value is:
>>>>> c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
>>>>> "francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr <mailto:francoise.baho...@ifsttar.fr>",
>>> role = c("cre","aut")),
>>>>> person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
>>>>> "blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylv...@yahoo.fr>", role
>>> = c("aut"))
>>>>>
>>>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
>>>>> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
>>>>> In title case that is:
>>>>> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
>>>>>
>>>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there"). The
>>>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
>>>>>
>>>>> /Henrik
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograf...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>
>>>>> <cartograf...@gmail.com <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to
>>> use r-devel?
>>>>>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made
>>> dev_tool::check.
>>>>>> How can I solve my problem ?
>>>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe
>>> Ligges<lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
>>> <mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> a écrit : I cannot beloeve
>>> it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>>>>>
>>>>>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with a recent R-devel version on the package tarball should reproduce
>>>>>> the findings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Uwe Ligges
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograf...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:cartograf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from
>>> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks
>>> automatically.Debian:
>>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
>>>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the
>>> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args =
>>> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
>>>>>>> ── R CMD check results ──────────────────────────── cartograflow
>>> 0.0.0.9000 ────
>>>>>>> Duration: 54.6s
>>>>>>> 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
>>>>>>> R CMD check succeeded
>>>>>>> Can you help me to fix the problem?
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
>>>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org
>>> <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org> mailing list
>>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>> mailing list
>>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>
>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>> mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>> mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-package-devel@r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel@r-project.org>
>>> mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
______________________________________________
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
