On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Mark Powell wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Mark Powell wrote:
>
> >   Your technique below is even more efficient (and logical) as we don't
> > even bother running spamc when we already know the results we'll get. I
> > think that is how 1.24 should handle the spam checking. Currently 1.23 is
> > broken.
>
> Attached is a patch to fix this problem. You also need to put the
> following two lines near the start of QS.pl, but that meant me patching
> configure etc. and I'm bone idle, so I just edited mine directly :)

I take it the silence means the patch worked? :)
  Cheers.

-- 
Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford
Information Services Division, Clifford Whitworth Building,
Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK.
Tel: +44 161 295 4837  Fax: +44 161 295 5888  www.pgp.com for PGP key


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to