On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Jason Haar wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 05:12:55PM +0100, Mark Powell wrote:
> > Hi,
> > There is nothing else logged for that message. QS just leaves the files
> > lying around and the message is stuck forever :(
>
> Well that doesn't make sense. Qmail-Scanner doesn't give a monkeys about the
> exit status of a message that is piped through SA - unlike AV, Q-S will
> carry on delivering a message that fails in any way, shape, or form under SA.

Yeah it seems very strange. Spamc just outputs "0/0" when the file is too
big. You'd think nothing could go wrong there, but I've located the
problem down to just that. Use the 1.22 QS.pl and it's fine move the 1.23
QS.pl back in and it fails on large spam checked emails.

> Are you running a patched version or something?

It's perl 5.8.5, SpamAssassin 2.64. Nothing is patched. 1.22 works with
the same perl and SA that 1.23 has problems with.

> That problem certainly doesn't exist for me, and I would have thought
> others would have reported problems by now if it was a general
> problem...

Yeah, it's very strange. I've never had problems with QS before. It's
always been so easy to get a new version running. I just can't see why
it's doing this. The logs just stop at the SA line and that's it. Spamd is
not contacted at all.
  Cheers.

-- 
Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford
Information Services Division, Clifford Whitworth Building,
Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK.
Tel: +44 161 295 4837  Fax: +44 161 295 5888  www.pgp.com for PGP key


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
Qmail-scanner-general mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general

Reply via email to