On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 08:12:01AM -0500, Trey Nolen wrote: > How about this....We have noticed that our queue is getting fairly large > (for us). We think that the queue is getting big because we were still > sending notices to sender. With the new Mime checking, there are a lot of > notices that seem to be going to bad addresses. Same deal with the addresses > Klez makes up. We totally blew away the queue, because there were very few > messages with a chance of delivery. The problem cropped up again when the > qmail queue got to about 1000 messages. Since then, we have disabled sender > notification in the hopes that queue size will drop. Still, 1000 messages > seems pretty small to start having performance issues.
... not for a 486 it wouldn't :-) Could this be a hardware issue? What kind of computer are you running it on, and how much mail (e.g. msg/sec) are you processing? One of the advantages of Qmail-Scanner is that once the message has been processed, Q-S should not have to process it again. i.e. messages going to non-existant addresses (due to Klez) aren't processed more than once by Q-S - so having 1,000s lying around in your queue isn't causing Q-S to be called again - only Qmail. -- Cheers Jason Haar Information Security Manager Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +64 3 9635 377 Fax: +64 3 9635 417 _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Qmail-scanner-general mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qmail-scanner-general
