I also agree that having 2.18 as LTR would be advisable. The switch to 3.x will be very delicate for many organizations, therefore lot of people will stitch to 2.x LTR before doing the big jump. That will mean that 2.14 will be mantained for a very long time if we won't have a new LTR...
m2c, giovanni 2016-10-20 10:47 GMT+02:00 Régis Haubourg <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > Let's be more flexible and allow ourself to break the strict rule that >> > an LT version can only appear once a year, every third release. Rules >> > are here to break where useful/necessary. >> >> It makes sense to me - let's see, if 2.18 will be a good, stable version >> we can promote it to LTR. >> >> All the best, and thanks. >> >> -- >> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu >> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html >> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > > Hi all, > same here, users would not understand not having 2.18 as LTR. > Régis > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
