Il 20/10/2016 09:56, Neumann, Andreas ha scritto: >> I am in favor of shooting down any 2.20 plans and fully focus on 3.0 to >> reduce the backporting overhead and improve dev-time and user-awareness >> towards 3.0. >> > > +1
Also +1 >> We could potentially also allow some non-intrusive features to land in >> there (some plans regarding this already exist). >> > > +1 again. agreed > ----------------------- > > > > I'd also like to revisit the discussion about ending 2.x with an LT version. > > It just seems illogical to me, to not end 2.x with an LT version. It is > kind of a waste of resources if we continue to backport stuff to 2.14 > only and loose out on the many useful new features that were introduced > in 2.16 and 2.18. Think about all the nice things, like multi-attribute > search, multi-attribute editing, forms/widget improvements, and many > more - that won't reach the masses, because they are not in an LT > release for at least another year! > > Let's be more flexible and allow ourself to break the strict rule that > an LT version can only appear once a year, every third release. Rules > are here to break where useful/necessary. It makes sense to me - let's see, if 2.18 will be a good, stable version we can promote it to LTR. All the best, and thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
