On 10/20/2016 09:07 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 04:59:32PM +1000, Nyall Dawson wrote: >> I'm just wondering what the plans are following 2.18's release >> tomorrow?
I am in favor of shooting down any 2.20 plans and fully focus on 3.0 to reduce the backporting overhead and improve dev-time and user-awareness towards 3.0. We could potentially also allow some non-intrusive features to land in there (some plans regarding this already exist). > > At the moment master_2 Travis builds fail, so maybe we should > first make sure to be able to release tomorrow ? > > https://travis-ci.org/qgis/QGIS/builds And looking at the failing test here, that shouldn't be something we should worry about: https://dash.orfeo-toolbox.org/testDetails.php?test=47814587&build=249133 Plus I'd prefer to keep this discussion separate. Matthias > > --strk; > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
