On 10/20/2016 10:43 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 20/10/2016 09:56, Neumann, Andreas ha scritto: >> I'd also like to revisit the discussion about ending 2.x with an LT version. >> >> It just seems illogical to me, to not end 2.x with an LT version. It is >> kind of a waste of resources if we continue to backport stuff to 2.14 >> only and loose out on the many useful new features that were introduced >> in 2.16 and 2.18. Think about all the nice things, like multi-attribute >> search, multi-attribute editing, forms/widget improvements, and many >> more - that won't reach the masses, because they are not in an LT >> release for at least another year! >> >> Let's be more flexible and allow ourself to break the strict rule that >> an LT version can only appear once a year, every third release. Rules >> are here to break where useful/necessary. > > It makes sense to me - let's see, if 2.18 will be a good, stable version > we can promote it to LTR.
Or make 2.20 the last LTR. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
