Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes:
> On 1/30/21 12:53 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> To summarize: >> >> 1) accel->cpu_realizefn extends the current cpu target-specific realize >> functions with accelerator-specific code, >> which currently does not make use of errp at all (thus, the temptation to >> remove errp from the interface until it is actually needed by a target). > > No, arm does use errp in realizefn already. > It's just that the void return value is hinky. Sounds like fixing the void return would be part of a larger qdev clean-up rather than this particular series. If I recall there have been various phases of clean-ups and refactoring of the error code paths in the past. > > > r~ -- Alex Bennée
