On 1/30/21 12:53 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> To summarize:
> 
> 1) accel->cpu_realizefn extends the current cpu target-specific realize 
> functions with accelerator-specific code,
>    which currently does not make use of errp at all (thus, the temptation to 
> remove errp from the interface until it is actually needed by a target).

No, arm does use errp in realizefn already.
It's just that the void return value is hinky.


r~

Reply via email to