On 1/30/21 12:53 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote: > To summarize: > > 1) accel->cpu_realizefn extends the current cpu target-specific realize > functions with accelerator-specific code, > which currently does not make use of errp at all (thus, the temptation to > remove errp from the interface until it is actually needed by a target).
No, arm does use errp in realizefn already. It's just that the void return value is hinky. r~