Emilio G Cota writes:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 18:19:11 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
>> (snip)
>> > +/**
>> > + * DisasContextBase:
>> > + * @tb: Translation block for this disassembly.
>> > + * @pc_first: Address of first guest instruction in this TB.
>> > + * @pc_next: Address of next guest instruction in this TB (current during
>> > + * disassembly).
>> > + * @num_insns: Number of translated instructions (including current).
>> > + * @singlestep_enabled: "Hardware" single stepping enabled.
>> > + *
>> > + * Architecture-agnostic disassembly context.
>> > + */
>> > +typedef struct DisasContextBase {
>> > + TranslationBlock *tb;
>> > + target_ulong pc_first;
>> > + target_ulong pc_next;
>> > + DisasJumpType jmp_type;
>> > + unsigned int num_insns;
>> > + bool singlestep_enabled;
>> > +} DisasContextBase;
>>
>> - @pc_next: I'd stick with @pc, it's shorter, it's everywhere already, and
>> with the documentation it's very clear what it is for.
>> - @jmp_type: missing doc :-)
> Also, consider keeping the @is_jmp name instead of renaming it to
> @jmp_type. (@jmp would be shorter but it would be confusing though,
> e.g. cris has both dc->jmp and dc->is_jmp.)
I just figured that this series could also take the chance of trying to rename a
few common variables I'm changing to something more readable.
But if you feel very strongly about keeping the original names (and minimizing
the diffs as you say later), I'll revert the name changes.
Thanks,
Lluis
