On 18 June 2017 at 15:37, Lluís Vilanova <vilan...@ac.upc.edu> wrote: > I seem to remember we discussed this at some point before I sent the first > version, to allow multiple targets on the same binary, but decided against it. > > Still, I can leave the ops struct in place without even trying to support > multiple targets. It should be a little bit slower (using function pointers > instead of a "template"), but I don't think performance will suffer that much > since we're at the translation path. > > Any other opinions on this and the point above?
Multiple targets in one binary is one of those things that I would like to see us do some day. So while I wouldn't do huge amounts of work purely to support it, if we have two designs which are otherwise more-or-less equivalent and only one has a path available to support multi-target binaries we should probably prefer that one. thanks -- PMM
