Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> writes:
> On 31.05.2017 13:11, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 05/30/2017 08:11 AM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this a v2 patch? If so, it's best to repost it as a new top-level
>>>>> thread rather than buried in reply to your v1 patch. Also, be sure to
>>>>> include v2 in the subject line ('git send-email -v2' works wonders for
>>>>> that).
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I reworked it, fixed title and it's more like v3.
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Do I still need to resend it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> A human maintainer can often (eventually) figure out what's going on if
>>> you don't, but resending is easier if you want to ensure the automated
>>> patch tools don't lose things.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> However, ivshmem doesn't have a maintainer. Since the patch is really
>> simple, the easiest path forward could be sending a v3 with
>> cc: qemu-triv...@nongnu.org.
>>
>
> OK, I will do this.
Thank you for your patience (and the patch, of course).
