On 31.05.2017 13:11, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 05/30/2017 08:11 AM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> Is this a v2 patch? If so, it's best to repost it as a new top-level
>>>> thread rather than buried in reply to your v1 patch. Also, be sure to
>>>> include v2 in the subject line ('git send-email -v2' works wonders for
>>>> that).
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>> I reworked it, fixed title and it's more like v3.
>>>
>>
>>> Do I still need to resend it?
>>>
>>
>> A human maintainer can often (eventually) figure out what's going on if
>> you don't, but resending is easier if you want to ensure the automated
>> patch tools don't lose things.
>
> Yes.
>
> However, ivshmem doesn't have a maintainer. Since the patch is really
> simple, the easiest path forward could be sending a v3 with
> cc: qemu-triv...@nongnu.org.
> OK, I will do this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
