Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
> On 05/30/2017 08:11 AM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Is this a v2 patch? If so, it's best to repost it as a new top-level
>>> thread rather than buried in reply to your v1 patch. Also, be sure to
>>> include v2 in the subject line ('git send-email -v2' works wonders for
>>> that).
>>>
>
>>
>> I reworked it, fixed title and it's more like v3.
>>
>
>> Do I still need to resend it?
>>
>
> A human maintainer can often (eventually) figure out what's going on if
> you don't, but resending is easier if you want to ensure the automated
> patch tools don't lose things.
Yes.
However, ivshmem doesn't have a maintainer. Since the patch is really
simple, the easiest path forward could be sending a v3 with
cc: qemu-triv...@nongnu.org.
