On 13/10/2015 21:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Yeah, the shutdown behavior was never implemented before, so now we are > just deviating from the documented Pentium & 486 behavior in a different > (and less surprising?) way. > >> > >> > With the typo fix in the Cc tag: >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Eduardo, it's okay if you take it through your x86 branch; it's not super urgent. Paolo
