On 10/23/15 20:19, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:40:01PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Eduardo, >> >> On 10/13/15 21:45, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 13/10/2015 21:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>>>> Yeah, the shutdown behavior was never implemented before, so now we are >>>>> just deviating from the documented Pentium & 486 behavior in a different >>>>> (and less surprising?) way. >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> With the typo fix in the Cc tag: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> >>>> >>>> Eduardo, it's okay if you take it through your x86 branch; it's not >>>> super urgent. >>> >>> Applied. Thanks! >>> >> >> can you please send a PULL with this? >> >> We're in soft freeze for 2.5, according to >> <http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.5>, but this qualifies I think. > > Done (and pulled by Peter). Sorry for delaying the pull request until > after soft freeze.
Not a problem, and thanks a lot to you both :) I wasn't concerned about the soft freeze (mainly), I just got bored rebasing the patch again and again :) Thanks! Laszlo
