On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 04:40:01PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Eduardo, > > On 10/13/15 21:45, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:42:50PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 13/10/2015 21:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >>> Yeah, the shutdown behavior was never implemented before, so now we are > >>> just deviating from the documented Pentium & 486 behavior in a different > >>> (and less surprising?) way. > >>> > >>>>> > >>>>> With the typo fix in the Cc tag: > >>>>> > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> > >>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > >> > >> Eduardo, it's okay if you take it through your x86 branch; it's not > >> super urgent. > > > > Applied. Thanks! > > > > can you please send a PULL with this? > > We're in soft freeze for 2.5, according to > <http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.5>, but this qualifies I think.
Done (and pulled by Peter). Sorry for delaying the pull request until after soft freeze. -- Eduardo
