Martin Christensen wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >>>>>>"Kent" == Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Kent> [Karrigell is GPL'ed] Unfortunately this makes it impossible for > Kent> me to consider using Karrigell in my work. I recently needed a > Kent> stand-alone web server for a small in-house project that might > Kent> possibly be distributed to business partners or become a product > Kent> some day. I chose CherryPy in part because its license allows > Kent> this. I would have considered Karrigell if it had a different > Kent> license. > > None of this really matters, you know. The GPL only requires that you > share your source code if you _distribute_ your modifications. Since > you make your modifications exclusively for your own (your company's) > use, you are not required to share anything. Thus the whole debate is > pretty much moot if I am not much mistaken.
In the text you quoted I said, "a small in-house project that might possibly be distributed to business partners or become a product some day." Sounds like distribution to me. Kent -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
