-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "Ben" == Ben Sizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> Unfortunately, that doesn't really satisfy the GPL's concerns. Ben> The work arguably "contains or is derived from" Karrigell, which Ben> is explicitly covered in section 2b of the GPL. If you start Ben> excluding key clauses from the GPL, then there's little point Ben> using it.
You will also notice that section 2b of the GPL only applies to works that are published or distributed, and if a company bases its web site on Karrigell or any other GPL'ed web framework but does not share the code with anyone, it cannot be considered to be published nor distributed. Hence the GPL is a perfectly fine license for this kind of use. Martin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using Mailcrypt+GnuPG <http://www.gnupg.org> iEYEARECAAYFAkOpb34ACgkQYu1fMmOQldUApQCgxPvp3ozRGo+/J5kJlY+htd4T F/IAoLBlMz0Z9eamIDqsInaa4bPyxgyd =UXUa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
