Op 2005-11-03, Steven D'Aprano schreef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:53:37 +0000, Antoon Pardon wrote: > >>> I don't suppose you'd care to enlighten us on what you'd regard as the >>> superior outcome? >> >> No. I don't think a superior outcome is necessary to see that this is >> not sane behaviour. I don't care that much on how it gets fixed. > > It isn't broken, there is nothing to fix. The code does precisely what the > inheritance model promises to do.
That is not a contra argument. Delivering what is promissed says nothing about the sanity of what is promissed. It is even possible that a number of things that are sane in itself, produce something unsane when combined or in certain circumstances. -- Antoon Pardon -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
