On 06/21/2016 03:39 PM, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
Am 21.06.16 um 14:10 schrieb Tal Zion:
develop frontends in Java, Swift, Javascript, etc.
>
So how does this magic work? We developed a new compiler platform called
Bridge. At the heart of Bridge is the Bridge Extensible Code
Representation (BECR). Code in any language is parsed into an AST and is
then translated to the BECR. [.....]
easy as it**merely translates syntax. Then, Bridge translates the BECR
to LLVM IR and from there the code can be compiled to x86, arm, asm.js
or any other LLVM backend*.

So you have repeated .NET, or Parrot, or the JVM. What is new in your system that sets it apart from these?

Soon Bridge will be released as an open source project. We’d love to
hear your opinions about this project. We’re really excited and we can’t
wait to see Python being used in more and more places!

Make sure you can do better than those:

http://ironpython.net/ (Python on .NET)
http://parrot.org/ (Python on the Perl-VM)
http://www.jython.org/ (Python on the JVM)

All of those projects promise a seamless integration of several languages in a single VM. ALl of them have failed in the sense that the languages have not converged onto that platform.

    Christian

Hi Christian,
Thank you for your opinion, it is much appreciated.
There are similarities but there are also a few important implementation differences:

* It is easier to add languages to Bridge than it is to any of the above platforms: In order to make Python run on those platforms, those projects needed to write a compiler from Python to those platforms' respective intermediate languages. That is a very hard task. In Bridge, we provide the BECR, which makes it easy to re-use concepts implemented in other languages. For example, after we are done adding enough concepts to the BECR to compile 100% of Python's features, adding Ruby will be relatively easy as there are many similar concepts between the two languages.

* Bridge enables Python code to interact with more languages through our external interfaces: Bridge code can interact with libraries not compiled to Bridge. So Python code will be able to call Swift, Objective-C, Java, and C code, to name a few, even if they weren't compiled to Bridge.

* Bridge integrates with CPython in order to provide the same experience developers are used to: There are many Python modules written in C which are not usable in the above platforms. In Bridge you can use any CPython module. So when you are creating a Python list in Bridge, you are actually using CPython's list implementation.

* Bridge makes Python faster: Python code compiled through Bridge is compiled to native code. Because we are leveraging LLVM's many optimizations, Python code will run faster than ever.

* Bridge is more hackable: Using plugins, Bridge is much more accessible to community participation.

Most importantly, Bridge will enable Python code to run on many new platforms (iOS, Android, web browsers..), while none of the above platforms provide this ability. We aren't looking to compete with CPython, but rather to complement it.

Tal
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to