On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 20:51 CEST, Johannes Bauer wrote: > On 07.06.2015 10:22, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > >> That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both >> the needed time AND the output. > > And you also posted your solution. I fail to find any question in > your original posting at all.
That is because there was no question: I just wanted to share something I thought that could be useful. If you would have taken the trouble to read a little, you would have known that. >> Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going down. > > Maybe you should start asking questions that people are able to > comprehend so that you get an answer that you like. I do not want answer I like, but an answer that is useful. >> Here I get an alternative that does only half what I want and when >> writing an alternative for ‘!find’ I am told I could use ‘!find’ >> (which only works in ipython, not python and which also not works >> with Windows). > > Protip: Ditch the shitty attitude. I don't know if you're a jerk or > not but I know for sure that you sound like one. Makes it also much > less likely to get the answers you'd like. So if someone gives an answer that is completely useless it is a shitty attitude when I point this out? Very interesting indeed. I do not think I have to expect something useful from you, it looks like you prefer name calling. Luckily there are a lot of people that have a different attitude. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
