On Sunday 7 Jun 2015 11:06 CEST, Luca Menegotto wrote: > Il 07/06/2015 10:22, Cecil Westerhof ha scritto: >> That only times the function. I explicitly mentioned I want both >> the needed time AND the output. >> >> Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going down.... > > First of all, thank God it's a newsgroup, not a list.
My bad. > Second, often the quality of an answer is deeply connected to the > quality of a question. I've red your question, and I still have not > clear what you want. Well, it was not a question, it was sharing. I wanted something that showed the needed time, but also the result. It was not a piece of art, but something I thought could be useful to share. > If you want a function that returns a result and a time elapsed, why > don't you pack the time and the result in a tuple, a list or a > dictionary? it takes 20 seconds, if you are slow. I already did that. Sort of. I made a version that defaults to printing the needed time and returning the result, but can me made to put the time in a tuple with the result. I must be very slow. :'-( It took more as 20 seconds. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
