On Monday 8 Jun 2015 07:04 CEST, Johannes Bauer wrote: > On 07.06.2015 22:35, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > >>> And you also posted your solution. I fail to find any question in >>> your original posting at all. >> >> That is because there was no question: I just wanted to share >> something I thought that could be useful. If you would have taken >> the trouble to read a little, you would have known that. > > You actually didn't write that. You wrote "I have a problem. Here is > my solution. This is how it works." Okay, so what? If you would have > taken the time to write "Just wanted to share this" your intention > would have been obvious.
Again: if you just had read other posts you would have found that I acknowledged that. >>>> Sadly the quality of the answers on this list is going down. >>> >>> Maybe you should start asking questions that people are able to >>> comprehend so that you get an answer that you like. >> >> I do not want answer I like, but an answer that is useful. > > Sorry to break it to you, but this group does not revolve around > you. An answer that might not be useful to you might be useful for > someone else and it surely is useful to get a discussion. Where do you find that I think that the group revolves around me? Well it could be useful for someone to write something about how to pay less taxes. But I do not think it should be posted in this group. >>>> Here I get an alternative that does only half what I want and >>>> when writing an alternative for ‘!find’ I am told I could use >>>> ‘!find’ (which only works in ipython, not python and which also >>>> not works with Windows). >>> >>> Protip: Ditch the shitty attitude. I don't know if you're a jerk >>> or not but I know for sure that you sound like one. Makes it also >>> much less likely to get the answers you'd like. >> >> So if someone gives an answer that is completely useless it is a >> shitty attitude when I point this out? Very interesting indeed. > > Precisely. Especially the tone you used is proof of your really > shitty attitude. Do you ever look into a mirror? >> I do not think I have to expect something useful from you, it looks >> like you prefer name calling. Luckily there are a lot of people >> that have a different attitude. > > Indeed you can expect nothing more from me and I purposely omitted > the way I do timing from this discussion. I do not aid people who > fail to recognize their major social dysfunction. Not even when they > are coding geniuses. Which, judging from your code snippet, you > clearly aren't. And again the name calling. You think you are very superior, don't you? You have a problem with my tone, well I do not even get near you: you clearly are the master. If I would like to become dysfunctional I should treasure your postings. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
