Hallöchen! Peter Decker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/30/05, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I didn't want to say that Dabo is bad. I just wanted to point >> out that its presence (and the presence of comparable projects) >> doesn't ease the IMO unfortunate situation with GUI toolkits for >> Python. > > Perhaps, but I see it differently, since Dabo doesn't attempt to > add a new toolkit. Well, effectively, it does so because from the human point of view, the programming interface is what you have to deal with. > [...] Dabo is giving me the best of both worlds: a Pythonic > language, and great-looking GUI apps. So I feel that it is > improving the situation with GUI toolkits for Python in that it is > allowing me to use the best toolkit without having to write > un-Pythonic code. You found a solution for you, which is a good thing. I don't want to rule out to use Dabo myself. But in my institute I'd like to present Python as a viable alternative to Delphi. In order to convince people who are used to a homogeneous rock-solid system, you must present something equivalent. Of course an open-source project can never be as homogeneous, but I can't make the whole team switch to a niche project, ignoring all other GUI alternatives about which you can even buy books in German! They'll think "strange, that Python" (or maybe "strange that Torsten" ;). > It would be great if the wxPython folks would adopt Dabo, and > eventually integrate it so that there is but a single, Pythonic > way of working with wxPython, Yes indeed. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
