On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:45 +0200, Torsten Bronger wrote: > Yes, this is what I meant with "legacy code". C and C++ are > actually special-purpose. They are good for controlling a computer > but not for implementing an idea. Their current vitality on almost > all software areas arise from the fact that they had been extremely > successful before Java, C#, and VB came into play.
Unfortunately your assertion is patently false. C and C++ are very much general-purpose languages. It is a logical contradiction to assert that Java, C#, VB and Python are general-purpose languages while C and C++ are not when the former were implemented using the latter. Being implemented in C, Python can do nothing that C cannot. It can certainly make it *easier* to do things, but it conveys no new abilities other than that of meeting deadlines ;) As an aside, I don't disagree with what I think is your main point: higher-level abstractions make more advanced ideas feasible. You simply state it far too strongly. Regards, Cliff -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.develix.com :: Web applications and hosting :: Linux, PostgreSQL and Python specialists :: -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
