Reinhold Birkenfeld wrote: > Peter Hansen wrote: >> Would basestring() be a better name?
> "tobase"? > "tostring"? > "tobasestring"? Of these choices, the latter would be preferable. > Alternative is to set a class attribute "Base" of the > Path class. Or export PathBase as a name from the module > (but that's not quite useful, because I > expect Path to be imported via "from os.path import Path"). I don't understand how that would work. An attribute on the *class*? What would it be, a callable? So mypath.Base(mypath) or something? Please elaborate... What about just .basestring, as a read-only attribute on the Path object? -Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
