On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote: > On 05/13/2013 06:53 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: >> I much prefer the alternative <> for != but some silly people insisted >> that this be removed from Python3. Just how stupid can you get? >> > > So which special methods should the <> operator call? By rights it ought to > call both __gt__ and __lt__ and return True if either of them is True.
Why do you think that? After all, the != operator doesn't call __factorial__ and __assignment__ and return True if either is True, does it? ChrisA PS. :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
