On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2013.05.13 17:53, Mark Lawrence wrote: >> I much prefer the alternative <> for != but some silly people insisted >> that this be removed from Python3. > It's not removed from Python 3, though: > > Python 3.3.1 (v3.3.1:d9893d13c628, Apr 6 2013, 20:30:21) [MSC v.1600 64 bit > (AMD64)] on win32 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>>> from __future__ import barry_as_FLUFL >>>> 3 <> 2 > True
I'd like to see ≠ added as a synonym for !=, even if nobody uses it. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list