On 13May2013 21:41, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote:
| On 05/13/2013 07:30 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| >On 13May2013 19:22, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote:
| >| On 05/13/2013 06:53 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
| >| >I much prefer the alternative <> for != but some silly people insisted
| >| >that this be removed from Python3. Just how stupid can you get?
| >|
| >| So which special methods should the <> operator call? By rights it
| >| ought to call both __gt__ and __lt__ and return True if either of
| >| them is True.
| >
| >Surely it should require both of them to be true...
|
| Then it would never be true. At least not for numbers.
Well that was the point. The _symbol_ looks like it should want
both. Next time I'll include the smiley.
Cheers,
--
Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au>
I really don't like :-) symbols as well. I feel that if you can't see the pie
coming, you deserve whipped cream up your nose.
- r...@cherry.cray.com (rob derrick)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
