On Jan 15, 12:25 pm, Paul Rubin <http://phr...@nospam.invalid> wrote: > r <rt8...@gmail.com> writes: > > Sounds like the results of poor testing and lack of design good > > program logic > > It would sure be nice if the language made it easier, not harder.
I am for anything that makes debugging easier, as long as that "thing" doesn't take away the freedom i enjoy while writing Python code. If you can give me both then i will support your efforts -- The world does not need two Javas! Python's existence resides in a unique niche, Simplistic-Elegant- Programming-Bliss. Python promotes self reliance, you don't get the safety net you do with other languages. You must consider all the consciences/possible side-effects of your code. If you are going to use Python to design enormous systems(or operate on enormous data sources) -- at this point --, then you will need to do some enormous testing. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list