Heres a little food for thought, Maybe you did tell Python to hit the nail head, but your calculations of the direction vector were slightly off. Instead of a direct hit, the hammer grazed the head and now the resultant vector aims strait for your thumb -- Who's to blame here? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Luis Zarrabeitia
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Paul Rubin
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Rhodri James
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Paul Rubin
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... alex23
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Paul Rubin
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... alex23
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Roy Smith
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Paul Rubin
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... r
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... r
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Rhodri James
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... bearophileHUGS
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Michele Simionato
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... r
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Paul Rubin
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... r
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Paul Rubin
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... r
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... Paul Rubin
- Re: Does Python really follow its philosophy of "Re... r