On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:07:46 +1000, James Mills wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Michele Simionato > <michele.simion...@gmail.com> wrote: > (...) > >> It could just be an issue of practicality. Python is an industrial >> strength language with libraries for everything and you can use it for >> your daily work. There are nice little languages out there that are >> however not usable for real work because of lack of libraries/lack of >> support/small community etc. > > So _exactly_ how does this thread relate to the subject: Does Python > really follow its philosophy of "Readability counts"?
If you had followed the thread since the beginning, you'd see that the topic has evolved (or perhaps strayed) from the original subject. -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
