Tim Chase wrote: > Any respectable comparison of Python web frameworks should > include evaluation of at least Django and TG. Or at least give > good reason why the comparison excludes them.
When he said that he didn't want anything complex neither anything that used a templating system, I thought this had already excluded a lot of frameworks, including TG and Django. > Zope is also missing, but I'm not sure Zope qualifies so much as > a framework, but as an answer to the question "If Emacs were a > Python web environment, what would it look like?" He already had dislikings with Plone that weren't clear, maybe a lot of those are Zope related... I agree, though, that more time could be spent explaining "why" things were discarded / ignored. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
