Tim Chase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any respectable comparison of Python web frameworks should > include evaluation of at least Django and TG. Or at least give > good reason why the comparison excludes them.
I think you didn't read the foreword of the comparison. That is by no means a comprehensive comparison and is not meant to be one. Is a series of thoughts about the frameworks we already tried (we don't have to decide today) and the ones we experimented with. Django is not completely off the radar because I used it extensively this year but the company has certain requirements and the full stackness of Django is not really one of our needs. > Zope is also missing, but I'm not sure Zope qualifies so much as > a framework, but as an answer to the question "If Emacs were a > Python web environment, what would it look like?" Zope2/Plone2 is the one framework they are running away from :-) More KISS less over engineering, that's the mantra. > Django's built-in templating system is one of those things you > either love or you hate. Fortunately, if you're a hater, you can > mindlessly swap it out for your template system of choice with > minimal fuss. I really, really like Django (and its community and the competence of the developers) and I think it deserves what it has gained and more but we are not here to decide who's the best (there's always no best). -- Lawrence, oluyede.org - neropercaso.it "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it" - Upton Sinclair -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
