On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers > Michele Simionato a écrit : > > > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have > > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a > > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonder what the > > players are (for instance how Beaker does compare with flup?) > > Can't tell, but I'd trust the Pylons team on this kind of choices. > They're doing good job so far AFAICT.
Probably Beaker works well, but it is certainly NOT doing things as Eby recommends: http://dirtsimple.org/2007/02/wsgi-middleware-considered-harmful.html BTW, I know that Eby is asking opinions about WSGI 2.0 on the WSGI SIG and interested people may have a look there. Michele Simionato -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
